PDA

View Full Version : Sound check etiquette


Goes211
November 8th, 2006, 01:14 PM
Hello all

I'd posted this elsewhere a while ago and Pounce had posted an excellent reply.
Hoping this is helpful info.


Meet the soundcheck veteran. I’ve been gigging a lot these last two years after a break of about five years from the road. The joy of playing live is what makes it all worthwile. It is the true reward of the musician to be allowed to perform your tunes to an audience. You write by yourself, you record and rehearse by yourself or with your bandmates. The gig is basically the step up from masturbation to sex. I am a sideman in these gigs (guitar and bvoxes), which I actually quite enjoy for a change, being able to serve the tunes and look at the whole thing with a broader perspective without the pressure the main artist has.
Let me set the stage for you : the artist is one of my best friends, he has released 6 or 7 albums (3 on a major label, the rest - as his latest we’re promoting now - on indies or his own with distribution through a major).
We draw about 500 people to the average gig, but with summer coming up we’re playing big festivals with crowds up to 10000. When we play out, we bring our own FOH engineer and one “backliner/stage hand” who is also our “road manager” – fancy but deserved title for a fantastic guy completely devoted to helping us out as much as humanly possible. We can’t yet afford drums and guitar techs, neither do we have our own monitors and light people. We send out a “required PA” sheet, and suggest a PA company to the promoter. We headline a lot of mini-festivals with three or four bands playing, but we still only get to play with the same PA about every other gig. All this so you get the idea of the level we are at, and I am guessing this is the average for quite a few pro or semi-pro musicians out there.

So anyway : back to the soundcheck : long gone is the mystique or glamour of doing a soundcheck. It’s just something you have to go through if you want the concert to be an enjoyable experience. Which brings us to the priorities of the soundcheck :

- priority number 1 : getting a great FOH sound (FOH = front of house, the mix through the main speakers for the audience if you prefer). If the FOH sound sucks, you can play your best gig and it will still be a bad gig.

- priority number 2 : getting a great stage sound in the monitors. If the performers can hear themselves comfortably, they’re likely to give a better performance. However, this is still pointless if priority 1 isn’t achieved.

- priority number 3 : if a compromise needs to be reached for lack of time or lack of equipment (such as not enough monitor mixes/busses), the main artist or the front man/woman gets priority. Yeah, I know, this sucks donkey balls. Get a helmet. As far as I know, most of the audience isn’t coming to see ME but my friend with the name on the poster. Get your ego in check. However, this is still pointless if priority 1 isn’t achieved.

- priority number 4 : make it an enjoyable experience for everyone involved. Meaning, can we achieve priorities 1, 2 and 3 without being assholes to FOH and monitors people, light people, promoters, stage hands, etc ? I played a gig just last night where we weren’t headlining, and the headlining star act were complete assholes to the crew, they’re a bunch of has-beens riding a recent revival wave, enacting their past fame and so-called r n’ r cred by treating everyone like dogshit, then coming on stage all gakked up like it’s a normal thing to do. A pathetic bunch, really. Anyway, our friendly and cooperative attitude with the sound and light crowd ensured we got better treatment. It’s not very cool to walk on stage, and the first thing you tell the monitors guy is : “this is the worst sound I’ve ever had”. Usually, people tend to NOT want to help you after these kinds of comments. In comparison, common courtesy HELPS A LOT. Here are some hints to try to achieve priorities 1 to 4…

- be on time. Even if it means YOU are going to have to WAIT. Keith Richards (or was it Charlie Watts ?) once said something like “40 years of Rolling Stones…5 years of action and 35 years waiting”. So you think you’re better than the Stones ?

- introduce yourself to the crew. “Hi, I’m Goes211, and I play guitar and sing bvoxes, how are you ? Oh, excuse me, what is your name ?”

- check what the dudes are busy with : there's no point insetting up your amps or drums if they haven’t finished setting up the PA yet. You’ll just make yourself a nuisance. Ask before you start lugging. Better for your back, and cooler for the crew. If in doubt, just ask : “hey guys, no rush or pressure, but any idea when you’ll be needing us to set up ?”

- setup is NOT the time to think of a new stage plot for the band. “Tried and tested” usually works best. you’re just asking for trouble if the keyboard player isn’t used to having the guitar player and his Marshall stack next to him. If you tell the PA guy “the bass goes there” (assuming you haven’t sent them a stage plot/layout plan before hand), it’s just going to be a hassle for him to change the lines and pull them across the stage if your change your mind. Most of the time, the PA people (I’m not talking about the engineers, I’m talking about the guys who lug the equipment and set it up on the stage, pull the lines, etc…) do an incredibly HARD job. They are here BEFORE we arrive and they leave long AFTER we’ve left the building. Be nice and show some respect. If they don’t show up, there’s no gig. And there is NO glory, autographs, glamour or groupies to be had for them.

- set up your equipment in a PRO way : no dangling cords. Make sure you have pro quality and long enough cords. Gaffer tape down everything that can be tripped on…

- The soundcheck is a COOPERATIVE effort to help out all the parties involved in getting the SOUND right to achieve their goal. SOUND. Does it say LIGHTcheck ? I didn’t think so. Light people, please avoid toying with your vari-lites while the band is setting up their equipment or simply trying to get through the soundcheck without killing each other or the monitors guy… Just give us some steady, non-flickering white or yellow lighting during soundcheck. You can have all the fun you want during the gig, and the audience will revel in your psychedelic endeavours. Hell, for all I now you’re going to make us look good. But for now, we’d like to NOT have to struggle just seeing the monitors and FOH people we are busy working with.

- stage levels : all bands ought to try to achieve what’s referred to as the elusive “natural balance” or “comfort zone” on stage where everyone hears himself (and the others) so he can perform best. Forget all the other rules and tatoo this one on your fat arm with a branding iron : TURN. IT. DOWN. Just ask the FOH and monitors guys, they’ll gladly carve it on your forehead with a tom-tom fork. How many of us can justify Jimi Hendrix levels ? I still remember the Woodstock movie (of course, that was before the days of the monitor mix) where Jimi’s band is playing, and they have a guy playing –cough…cough… - percussions… the poor sod is banging his bongos like there’s no tomorrow but all you can hear is the hum of the Marshalls… pathetic fucker… Today, playing too loud means EVERYONE needs to crank their volume and monitors up and it turns into an escalation. Time to introduce what is a bit of a mystery to me : most PA’s used to have “side monitors”. The “sides” were placed (duh !) on each side of the stage, facing the band, and they usually had some kind of general mix of the whole band. Which meant that if you had a basic mix of yourself in your own monitor and the “sides mix”, you could pretty much do ok. But most PA’s we run into don’t seem to have sides anymore these days…which means I need to ask a bit of everything else in my monitors, and myself louder if I want to be in the comfort zone. And I become part of the escalation race. What that means is that all the mics start to pick up A LOT more volume and the monitors and FOH people end up with a feedback accident waiting to happen. In such a situation, look at your tattoo : TURN. IT. DOWN.

- During soundcheck : be available for the FOH and monitors engineers : once soundcheck has started, this should be your ONLY preoccupation. WAIT for your fucking turn ! Soundcheck usually starts with the drums. Typically, the FOH engineer will ask for Kick, Snare, Toms, Hats, Overheads, pad/samplers, etc…separately and then together. Wait for the engineer’s instructions. If he needs you to hit the floor tom for an extra minute it’s because he’s trying to fix a problem likely coming from YOUR drums, you moron ! Hit the fucking floor tom and STFU. Then bass, then bass and drums. Then guitars or keys, then voxes. DO NOT PLAY when it is not your turn. You are being an ASSHOLE if you play when not asked. You are also being an asshole if you DON’T PLAY when asked. Open your fucking ears and LISTEN to what these people are asking ! If you are a guitar or keyboard player. : tell the FOH guy you are going to give him your loudest sound first so he can set his levels. Then proceed to do so and DO NOT change your levels without first warning both FOH and monitors.

- Which brings me to : soundcheck mystery number 2 : it still routinely happens that the FOH and/or monitors engineers DON’T plug in a mic to communicate with the band on stage. What this means is a deaf and dumb dialogue where nobody hears each other and EVERYBODY is frustrated – this includes bad communication between the FOH and monitors, which usually includes some patching mistakes between stage and FOH. Our drummer (well, he is a drummer, right) still has not understood that if he’s not talking INTO a fucking mic, our FOH guy 50 yards away will NOT hear him. It’s a running joke for us now and we place bets on the time before he realizes. A good and efficient soundcheck should be 1. the FOH engineer opens some vocals mics so the band can communicate with him. 2. He asks if everybody can hear him (this might mean a designated band member to communicate with him). Then he goes through every instrument. 3. In the meantime, the monitors guy gets a rough mix for every instrument. 4. the band plays a tune together for FOH adjustments 5. We stop and each musician gets to ask the monitor guys some corrections. 6. Some instruments may need to play separately for final FOH adjustments. 7. End the soundcheck with the first tune of your set. That will avoid you starting with a “surprise tune” for the FOH guy.

- BTW : there’s no point in questioning what the FOH guy does because YOU CAN NOT JUDGE HIS WORK FROM THE STAGE. Don’t trust your friends, they don’t know shit. Don’t trust your girlfriend or wife, there’s never enough of your guitar in the mix for her. But if many people come to you after a gig to tell you it was too loud or that the sound was terrible, that’s a hint.
It's also a good idea to thank everyone before you leave. You'll hopefully be working with these people again. It costs you nothing, and makes everybody feel better.

Ultimately, the sound check’s purpose is to make everybody’s experience of the gig a good and memorable one. Generally, it’s ok to be demanding and to have a desire for perfection. In real gig life, the average sound check lasts about 30 minutes (if you play festivals, all you get is a "line-check" - which means testing all the lines and mics work, and then you're off). So you just might have to make do with an “average” situation which may be improved upon during the gig if everyone (FOH, monitors AND musicians) pays attention to each other. We always ask the monitor guys to watch us during the couple first tunes. It’s amazing that they often IGNORE that. Remember the first lie of rock n' roll : "it'll sound better with the crowd". Oh well. Here I am. Fucking former Jr. Rebel playing Mr. Givalesson. Still, I’m sure I’ve forgotten many points. Please chime in. Coolio




live sound engineers obviously want to make bands sound good 100% of the time, and are usually working shitty long hous and are not frequently thanked for thier work.

if you are a band, be on time. that's part of the gig. find out when the space opens, when crew are there to receive you (ie: when are you expected), and who you are to talk to.

talk to the right people. the foh guy doesn't care about "the door" and the manager of the club doesn't usually know how many compressors you have.

make friends with everybody. here's two words to practive using.. please or thank you. give that a try.

have a stage plot, input list, and tech rider as well as a hospitality rider and a contract. if you don't know what these are yet you have some homework to do. again, with respect to these, have them current and correct. and ask the right people questions about their respective roles in fulfilling these riders and contracts. and that please and thank you thing.

imho, i want to get a stage monitor situation happening first as the stage volume will affect how i mix the foh. and the onstage mix(es) will affect the bands performance, so i address it first. the foh mix will happen later, and will change with an audience in the room as well. so that's for the foh guy to worry about during the show.

talking to the foh guy politely (and by name since you've introduced yourself, thanked him profusely, and know his favorite drink) and get a monitor mix that is agreeable to the whole band.

do not send a girlfriend to "help" with a mix

don't hurt the gear onstage or act like some sort of prima donna. that will NOT get the foh guy in the mood to help you to sound any better.

if there is any critical gear for "your original sound", then bring it with you or make sure it's there in your technical rider. and then call and confirm again that it's really there and working and that there aren't unnaceptable substitutions.

bring extra stuff, like spare picks, sticks, cables, etc.

have GAFF tape and not duct tape. if you put duct tape on MY cables you will leave with a new asshole.

you might want to provide a cd of your band to the venue when booking the show so that the sound guy can hear what you think a mix of your material should sound like. he can then bear that in mind when mixing the live show. i always think the mix of a band live should be similar to the mix on a cd, even when the performances or arrangements are modified for the live show. that's cool, improvisation and all, but the mix from the cd is probably a great starting point for the live sound engineer.

here's my "trick" when setting monitor levels -

first, i check the channels the same way every engineer does. and i start with drums. like everyone does. drums are always the lowest numbered channels on my board and i work my way up. (and i DO have a talkback mic on). so after i have something like the kick in the house and routed properly with compression and whatnot, i ask each bandmember who wants that sound in their monitor to raise their hand. (related to how many monitor mixes there are). i say leave your hand up if you want this sound in your monitor, and lower your hand when it is loud enough. i then send that sound out on enough auxes to cover all band members. (i do this when there are more mixes, like more than four or five). then go instrument by instrument and repeat until each mix has at least all of the elements needed at each monitor position. then when the whole band plays, we tweak the volumes, but the band has already technically chosen what is in each wedge and at what volume, so we have a good start. as you tweak from here, you can cue up each monitor mix and hear what you are sending them so it's easier to see what they are looking for.

after those monitor levels are set, you can work on foh. it will be different with an audience, but you get all the routing sussed out. done right, the band is happy, monitor level setting has went quickly, and you can worry about making it sound kick ass. should be relatively easy at this point.

but for getting the monitor levels set, having the band be polite, on time, not play or talk all at once, etc. is important. and why do folks who scream their vocals always whisper into mics during soundchecks? answer - they are clueless assholes.

i think i'm just rambling now, i'm at work on a break.

Spock
November 8th, 2006, 02:55 PM
Clap, calp, calp. Super job.

I can say the being nice to the crew really does help. Last year we got invited to be part of a two day street festival. We sent them a stage plot and input list, nothing fancy, just what we need. One thing we listed is that I use in ear monitors, they can skip the wedge and just run a line over by be me, XLR male or female, 1/4, it didn't matter, I could work with it.

Of course like most things the people running the business end of things only passed on the stage plots and requirements to the sound guys a few days before the show. So I'm on the phone with the head techie, someone that I've done business with on and off over many years. "So, yea, is the in ear feed going to be a problem?" "You need what? I don't know, first I heard about this, let me give you the number of Joe, the guy in charge of the sound for both stages."

I call Joe, explain who I am and who sent me and why. He said, shouldn't be a problem, look him as soon as we get to the festival.

Day of the gig, get on site, look up Joe, he's real cool about things, he walks me over to the monitor guy, and the stage manager. We all talk a few minutes.

At the end of our set, we got of quick and we all thanked the crew, they really we very nice to us. Friends tolds us we sounded top notch, so we pasted that on.

This festival doesn't like to repeat acts from year to year, but we were back again this summer. The reason why, Joe and the stage manager told the bookers for the event that we were the best, and they had to have us back. Joe was even working the other stage this year, but he made it a point to come find me, introduce me to the guy runing FOH for our stage before I even had a chance to get that far.

Guess what, it went off like clockwork. We had fun, the crowd was grooving to the music, and the crew all had smiles on their faces when we finished.

Everyone wins.

clicktrack
November 8th, 2006, 04:13 PM
Absolutely Fantastic.

Another point I'd like to re-emphasize is that musicians, no offense, but SOUNDCHECK IS NOT A REHEARSAL.

You see, you know your music. Or if you don't, well you shouldn't be on a stage doing soundcheck, should you?

Sound check is the time for the audio crew to get to know what it is that you do. Its the time when they find out whether your drummer is a bronx street basher or a pussy. Its the time when, in the space of a few minutes, the audio crew has a chance to figure out whether you're going to make the show mix hard work or easy as pie.

If you have a player who is filling in or doesn't know his parts, mention to the audio guys before sound check starts that you have to, at some point, work through some changes.

What that does is put an interrupt in their minds to make sure to leave some time for you.

At that point, if the day hasn't been a clusterfuck, they'll probably burn through soundcheck in an organized manner, have you play a "representative" song, and then leave you to your devices for 15 or 20 minutes. Again, thats if time allows.

Now the term "representative" song was used on purpose. By representative, I don't mean the quite accoustic song where the drummer's using brushes and all the vocalists are doing sensitive whispers. I mean the song in your set where you're playing in a manner that is representative of your entire set. Or hell...that song where you're going to be GIVING it. Remember...you know your song and set. The audio guys don't. You need to give them the benefit of hearing your "worst case" so they can prepare for it.

Whew...this started to be a one liner and turned into more...

..next up...what goes on inside the mobile during soundcheck...

:)

Cheers,
Click.

pounce
November 8th, 2006, 05:00 PM
i'll have more to add soon, but the obvious thrust of this thread and this situation in real life is that the relationship between the band and the soundguys is symbiotic. everyone wants to do a good job, and everyone wants it to sound right. no doubt about it. there are a few things that both the band and the soundguy can do to ensure that the band sounds right. in thinking about this from an objective point of view, you'd think it would be obvious that everyone would want to work as a team trying to get things right. otoh, in reality, some talent treats the tech crew like dirt or treats them well but doesn't know how to communicate what they want or need until it's too late. in those situations, it's unlikely that the talent will sound their best. what i know now that i didn't know back when i was in a band and gigging bars is what i needed to do those shows. i didn't know how, when, or what to say to the soundman. in retrospect, i now know what i should have communicated to them. so these posts are an attempt to get this information out there to folks who can have better sounding shows by figuring out and communicating their tech needs.

Pimp-X
November 8th, 2006, 10:08 PM
Fantastic. Though I do less and less FOH these days, this document so far covers everything I would say and more.

jerryskid
November 9th, 2006, 02:57 PM
This is something every musician show know....Nice job guys...

Johnny
November 10th, 2006, 01:32 AM
I try to spend at least some time teaching my students how to soundcheck. Do what the engineer says, and hit 'em like you're fixin' to when you play the songs.

I have a couple rules I'd like to propose:

Line check first, monitor levels second. I don't know if I need more floor tom yet.

Do everyone's monitors at once: kik--everyone raise your hand until you have enough kik, and so on.

subvocal
November 10th, 2006, 09:05 PM
This is very good info. Info I wish I'd had before my first "band" performance - ( where I was percieved as a large asshole).

I have several questions about live performance situations, but they have to do with equipment needs mostly.

Tons of experiance here at the Live Womb.
I'll be watching.
SV

Spock
November 10th, 2006, 09:14 PM
I have several questions about live performance situations, but they have to do with equipment needs mostly.


Well, OK, Start a new thread, post the questions.

A co-worker is just get a band started and yesterday started asking me a few real simple questions along the same lines.

Some how he got it in his head that wireless mics, even if he might only want to walk around with the mic for one song, would be a super idea. Both myself and another woman that does a lot of solo singing told him to forget the idea.

peter
November 10th, 2006, 09:20 PM
Some how he got it in his head that wireless mics, even if he might only want to walk around with the mic for one song, would be a super idea. Both myself and another woman that does a lot of solo singing told him to forget the idea.

what is your concern about wireless mics? I have used them a lot with different singers and it work great.

you just have to get real ones. not the cheep shit Twisted

pounce
November 10th, 2006, 09:33 PM
well, i use them all the time as well.

but really good mics and frequency agile uhf systems for sure. anything less than that is asking for trouble. i suspect what spock is getting at is that if there is no real NEED to be wireless, then skip the batteries and the possibility that there will be sound degradation or problems with the wireless transmission. just keep a wire in there and you eliminate a whole lot of variables. generally speaking, i want to have as few possible points of failure in a live setup as possible.

it makes me think of those horrible business theater events for which i run sound all of the time. they always insist on lavalier mics, and then they just stand behind the podium anyway. fucking idiots. yes, lavs sound worse and have a possibility of having the wireless signal go funny instead of the nice wired small condenser that is right in front of them anyway. sheer stupidity.

wireless can be ok, but do it right and know that you need it. otherwise, i will always recommend wired connections instead. at least when i'm involved in touring broadway it is done right. nice sennheiser systems which are great, new pro cell batteries for every show, the packs wrapped in unlubricated condoms to keep out any sweat, backup units, etc. freaking great. on that level you can do wireless great. dpa or countryman mics on all of that and your system is sweet. but less than that and you are starting to gamble. i guess if you've seen wireless fail on a show, watched fucking talent turn off their mics accidently and look at you like you did it, had a battery die, had rf interference, etc. you get more cautious around wireless as people should well be.

Knastratt
November 10th, 2006, 10:28 PM
That's great Goes. That list should be supplied to the band at gunpoint.

TURN. IT. DOWN. Just ask the FOH and monitors guys, they’ll gladly carve it on your forehead with a tom-tom fork.

That's the number one reason I gave up FOH. The day I realized that my urge to swap the paycheck for a 12" gauge actually could render me 12 to life - I quit.

Spock
November 10th, 2006, 10:53 PM
what is your concern about wireless mics? I have used them a lot with different singers and it work great.

you just have to get real ones. not the cheep shit Twisted

Well pounce said it. But yes, unless you get some real good stuff, its just not worth it. This guy is going to playing the same size or smaller places then my group has been playing. He's a guitarist, but thinks he has a song or two when he is not playing and then wants to move around. He just isn't going to have any place to move, and even if he does than a XLR cable of 50' would be more than he would ever need.

He said to me "I got to move man, come on Elvis moved."

I answered, "So Elvis had a mic cable and it didn't slow him down one bit. Are you saying your are better than Elvis?"

If he wants to waste his money, then OK he can buy the high end wireless systems. But considering that he is just getting a band started it would be a waste of money that he could put to something else that wil make a difference.

I've had a few times where I was upfront, not behind the keyboards. I hold the mic in my right hand, and I need something for my left to do. I like to hold the cable.

ggunn
November 10th, 2006, 11:06 PM
what is your concern about wireless mics? I have used them a lot with different singers and it work great.

you just have to get real ones. not the cheep shit Twisted

If there's no driving reason to go wireless, then don't. A mic and cable is simple and dependable; don't make things more complicated than they have to be. God knows that even in the simplest live setup, there are far too many things that can go wrong.

I was playing a gig with a lead singer who used a wireless mic, and when he left the stage while the rest of us played an instrumental number, he had the bright idea to turn off his mic to save his batteries. In the club next door, there was a guitarist who was wireless on the same frequency. Wanna guess what happened? It might have been OK had he been playing the same song as we were, I guess... ;^)

peter
November 10th, 2006, 11:18 PM
The other day I was running a show with 4 or 5 Bands. We had 5 wireless Microphones because one act had 5 singers who where running around the stage and dancing while thez where singing. So cable was out of Question. I was using the same Mics for the other acts too. This was the very first time I gave the bass player and guitar player wireless mics. I used Shure SLX systems which work flawless.

What I really liked on this situation: there where less Cable on Stage where you could fall over and the stage looked much more cleaned up. Changes between acts worked faster and everyone was happy.

paul mckenna
November 11th, 2006, 12:31 AM
This should be handed out to every band member as they get on the bus, then read out loud for those that don't read. I think it would clear up 3/4 of all problems with sound checks, and everyone would get along better. This is almost as important as the biggest rule of touring...."no crapping on the bus":icon_eek:

clicktrack
November 11th, 2006, 01:40 AM
This is almost as important as the biggest rule of touring...."no crapping on the bus":icon_eek:

LOL...And man...you DO NOT want to suffer the punishment for violating said rule... :)

AxeSlash
November 13th, 2006, 12:39 AM
That should be force fed to everyone ever thinking about coming within 20 feet of a microphone...AND their relatives/friends/significant others.

As for wireless, if you've got a selection of top end gear, go for it, it makes life a LOT easier on festivals and vocal-intensive shows.

But if Joe Local turns up with his £50 radio shack special, you can guarantee he'll be on a wired SM58 for the show if I've got anything to do with it. "Sorry mate, I'm not getting any signal from your receiver. Looks like it'll have to be a real wired mic for today, sorry..."

That's the problem - they think "it's wireless, therefore it's better". Even if the frequency response of said mic looks like the himalayas. "Sure you can use yoru shiny new radio shack wireless mic if you'd like to hear a selection of non-musical sine waves coming out of your monitor every few seconds!"

Rant over.

Spock
November 13th, 2006, 01:06 AM
Related to the other thread about wireless mics.

At festival we did last year, we were the second last act of the night. The last act did 50s stuff, "Jerry and the Greasers", (not the real name, but you get the idea). I've run into them before, Jerry has a real attitude. We got off the stage in record time, their drummer forgot his cymbals, and ended up slipping a few bucks to our drummer to use his. Jerry insisted on using his wireless mic. They were 10 minutes late starting, and his mic crapped out on the first song.

G. Hoffman
November 14th, 2006, 10:02 AM
- The soundcheck is a COOPERATIVE effort to help out all the parties involved in getting the SOUND right to achieve their goal. SOUND. Does it say LIGHTcheck ? I didn’t think so. Light people, please avoid toying with your vari-lites while the band is setting up their equipment or simply trying to get through the soundcheck without killing each other or the monitors guy… Just give us some steady, non-flickering white or yellow lighting during soundcheck. You can have all the fun you want during the gig, and the audience will revel in your psychedelic endeavours. Hell, for all I now you’re going to make us look good. But for now, we’d like to NOT have to struggle just seeing the monitors and FOH people we are busy working with.



OK, while I do appriciate where this is coming from, if I have 4 hours of programing to do in 1 hour, I've gotta do it. Please do understand that moving lights are not plug and play like a par rig. They take time to program, and promoters and producers never seem to take that into acount. Some degree of programing can be done ahead of time, IF I know enough about the gig, but more often than not that is simply not possible. I will always do my best to give you enough light to see by, but sometimes some programing just has to happen. Believe me, I'm working too, not toying around.

And while were at it, if sound guys could stop blowing 1k tone at 140 dB SPL through their rigs when I'm dangling from a truss and 6 feet in front of the mains, I'd sure appriciate it.


Gabriel

Goes211
November 14th, 2006, 10:44 AM
I offer a truce. No more strobes during soundcheck, we cut down on the 1k tone. Deal ?
:lol:

G. Hoffman
November 14th, 2006, 10:55 AM
I offer a truce. No more strobes during soundcheck, we cut down on the 1k tone. Deal ?
:lol:



Not a problem. :lol:


Hey, I NEVER do strobes durring a sound check, but I am probably going to be seting focus point durring sound check, because it is the only time I have a reference for where you are going to be standing.

For what it's worth, I was the guy arguing with the producer that for a show with 48 moving lights, I need to get into the room at 2:00 A.M., but they didn't want to pay the stage hands double time all day.


Gabriel

pounce
November 14th, 2006, 04:12 PM
i'll add the counterpoint that sound shouldn't be going on while riggers are up, or when folks are on a genie lift focusing. that's just more of the cooperative effort thing. and sound guys generally (in big shows with crews) shouldn't leave music just running if the stage is being worked on by lots of folks doing things who need to communicate. if the stage work is done, then folks can play music or screw with lights.

with respect to programming, the reverse still applies. i don't give a shit about what is or isn't programmed yet, don't turn lights off while folks are working on deck, don't mess with lights in the soundcheck, and dont' flash light on and off while folks are working around the lights (unless it's the focus). which is to say i've been pretty much looking at lights while setting up the set for a band and have had lights come on right in my face which is rude and unpleasant as i had to be there working on the set.

programming time should be more or less a set time of the day, and since crews should take meal breaks on different hours, programming for lights can also happen very peacefully when sound and set is at lunch. the reverse is true for line checks and other stage work done in bright light while lighting is at lunch. programming may or may not need more time, but i still expect it to happen politely and with respect to the bigger picture of all of the production elements working together on a show.

crews that work well together are a dream to work with, crews where lets say sound and lighting are always at odds with each other are extremely unpleasant to work for. it's a much more difficult day when they are stepping on each others toes.

burnsy
November 14th, 2006, 06:07 PM
It's these very threads that make me add more and more to my soundcheck and band forwarning that if you treat me like a cunt I will tell you to get off my stage. local ego bands are a popular one around here because there is only a few of us to tell them what they are really like.Good topic

pounce
November 14th, 2006, 07:34 PM
i am thinking that in general, bands that are cool are often pretty good. they just aren't worried about constantly proving it, they are already confident. while i'm not a huge country music fan, country music shows are delightful to work on (in general). band like lonestar or brookes and dunne are just great to work with. otoh, local bands that want to "act like rock stars" just because they are playing at some bar are intolerable. no doubt. some local bands are totally cool, some not so much. i doubt i would be able to deal with running sound in a bar all the time anymore. i'm too spoiled, and i wouldn't be able to put up with the attitude without saying something that would get me fired.

true story - a friend and local soundguy was working at a 1000 seat local venue in the middle of osu campus. some battle of the bands event. anyhow, i have to imagine that's as brutal of a job as you can get. he had been the house sound guy for a number of years at the venue. was busting his ass to make it happen, and the show went without a hitch. however, the band that won the battle of the local bands was talking trash about him and his mixing for them when he finally snapped and said that he was working hard for them and since they won the contest they ought to have kissed his ass for making them sound good and helping them win that day. instead, the band who had been trashing him to their buddies was so upset about being called on it by the house mixer that they complained to management at the venue and the house dude ended up getting fired over it. unbelievable. i would be getting fired everyday.

ggunn
November 14th, 2006, 08:51 PM
true story - a friend and local soundguy was working at a 1000 seat local venue in the middle of osu campus. some battle of the bands event. anyhow, i have to imagine that's as brutal of a job as you can get. he had been the house sound guy for a number of years at the venue. was busting his ass to make it happen, and the show went without a hitch. however, the band that won the battle of the local bands was talking trash about him and his mixing for them when he finally snapped and said that he was working hard for them and since they won the contest they ought to have kissed his ass for making them sound good and helping them win that day. instead, the band who had been trashing him to their buddies was so upset about being called on it by the house mixer that they complained to management at the venue and the house dude ended up getting fired over it. unbelievable. i would be getting fired everyday.

The house shot themselves in the foot; he's better off going elsewhere if that's the way they stand up for their employees.

pounce
November 14th, 2006, 09:43 PM
The house shot themselves in the foot; he's better off going elsewhere if that's the way they stand up for their employees.

exactly what i think about it

burnsy
November 14th, 2006, 11:21 PM
unbelievable. i would be getting fired everyday.

God help the crap I give some of the bands in my place when they act like cu*ts. Thing is if the venue is like that and wont back up their engineers then they arent worth working for.

Anyhow back into the music editor I go

bunnerabb
November 15th, 2006, 12:33 AM
My position is simple and I stand by it.

If can get somebody to do this better and deliver beter results with the joke budget I got and the pay you give me, you can use my phone to call them.

Period.

bunnerabb
November 15th, 2006, 12:36 AM
Fuck that shit.

My phone rings.

studjo
November 15th, 2006, 01:43 AM
werd


Jo

Spock
November 15th, 2006, 02:16 AM
This all comes done to what I like to call

Sandbox 101 - Working and Playing Well With Others.

It not just happens at sound checks, this is something that helps in all kinds of fields. Understand your requiments and communicate them clearly. Listen to the requirements of the other guy and try to meet them. You don't have to know the other guy's job, but have an idea so when yours butts up to his you know what he has to put up with.

Droolbucket
November 15th, 2006, 02:36 AM
In my humble opinion, a good sound man is the most important member of the band. It doesn't matter how good the band is, a bad sound guy can make them unbearable. On the other hand, I've seen some really average bands suddenly become hot commodities because they hired an excellent sound man. Overnight, the vocals become smoother, reverbs can mask pitchiness, the drums and bass are fat and punchy, which fills the dance floor, etc. I'm saying this as a guitar player, not a sound guy... I really appreciate a professional behind the board.
And since I'm an old grumpy bastard, here's Droolbucket's first rule of set-up:
If you're not helping, you're IN THE WAY.

I hate it when social hour breaks out on stage during set up or tear down.... you're trying to run cables, or place monitors, or carry amps, etc., and a musican and 2 or 3 of his buddies are swapping jokes in the middle of the stage. :Mad:

Maybe I just need a nap....
Droolbucket

bunnerabb
November 15th, 2006, 03:04 AM
the bands that know the difference adore me and tip me and give me props from stage.

the bands that don't usually wallow in bad ideas.

I deliver the goods.

the bands that get it adore me, the ones that don't carry on and I just count my money and go home.

pounce
November 15th, 2006, 01:56 PM
my load outs usually are a few hours long and involve a few semi trucks of gear. you don't slow down the out. now these bands have exellent dressing rooms and busses, so they can take the party to a better place. but slowing down the out isn't a good idea, so i'd rather not have a band joking and drinking before their gear is down.

Unfcknblvbl
November 15th, 2006, 07:53 PM
This seems like a good place for this to be posted (again).

bunnerabb
November 15th, 2006, 08:17 PM
I just realised how pompous that sounded.

What I meant was, most of the bands that use me at my gig are widely agreed to be the most adept bands, musically, that we book and the more.. amatuer groups, tend to be all arsed up about "their sound" and "their way of doing things" and dismiss using the house guy out of hand, often with mediocre results.

This isn';t because I'm the fucking man, it's because I know this room like the back of my hand and the kit and the songs and.. you know... Better shows.

AxeSlash
November 15th, 2006, 08:33 PM
programming time should be more or less a set time of the day, and since crews should take meal breaks on different hours, programming for lights can also happen very peacefully when sound and set is at lunch. the reverse is true for line checks and other stage work done in bright light while lighting is at lunch. programming may or may not need more time, but i still expect it to happen politely and with respect to the bigger picture of all of the production elements working together on a show.


You eat lunch on gigs? What are you, human? :Wink:

G. Hoffman
November 15th, 2006, 10:37 PM
You eat lunch on gigs? What are you, human? :Wink:



Naw, he's union. It's good work, when you can get it.


Gabriel

pounce
November 15th, 2006, 11:28 PM
the standard argument is that me not eating makes it more difficult for me to do my job, and therefore becomes more expensive. you can feed me, you can give me time off to eat, or you can pay a whole lot more to keep me on the clock the whole time. yes, this comes from my iatse membership. however, if i do any freelance gigs (in non union juristiction) i'm sticking with rules like this because they just plain make sense. when i negotiate my rate this is the kind of thing that is part of the discussion.

with so many other things being negotiatble, the fact that i eventually have to eat, sleep, and go to the bathroom are kind of facts of life!

G. Hoffman
November 16th, 2006, 09:25 AM
with so many other things being negotiatble, the fact that i eventually have to eat, sleep, and go to the bathroom are kind of facts of life!



While I can agree with all of that, and I actually do prefer to eat; there is a part of me that HATES coming back from lunch. On the really long shitty days, I always feel much more tired after lunch. I'm sure that the idea that lunch makes me more tired than without is an illusion, but there are days where it sure feels like it.


Gabriel

clicktrack
November 16th, 2006, 02:21 PM
This all leads to how a proper production day is planned...Pounce is dead on.

All of the productions I've worked that were organized that way...where people are spelled off in shifts for lunch...where people aren't competing for time on stage...where people have enough time to have a good meal. This all leads to shows going up and down smoothly.

And remember, you, as a person, are a machine. You'll think nothing of making sure all of your gear is well maintained prior to taking it out on a gig. Why not do the same for you? Its amazing how quickly a problem is solved when your machine (body) is well fed and maintained.

Click

bunnerabb
November 16th, 2006, 07:04 PM
Which is why I dug theatre gigs.

I used to be the house audio cat for the Sandusky State Theatre, which, after the whole crew, TD, ATD, AE and LD bailed, enmasse after figuring out that it was run by complete idiots, closed.

Load-in, unpack, break with doughnuts and coffee, set, sound check, focus, sort out the spot ops, dinner break that was catered, in house, tweak, door, show, strike, load-out.

No dicking around.

Never got my yellow card but I was never treated badly by those who had.

Playhouse Square is a different tin of biscuits.

burnsy
November 18th, 2006, 05:32 PM
Which is why I dug theatre gigs.

I used to be the house audio cat for the Sandusky State Theatre, which, after the whole crew, TD, ATD, AE and LD bailed, enmasse after figuring out that it was run by complete idiots, closed.

Load-in, unpack, break with doughnuts and coffee, set, sound check, focus, sort out the spot ops, dinner break that was catered, in house, tweak, door, show, strike, load-out.

No dicking around.

Never got my yellow card but I was never treated badly by those who had.

Playhouse Square is a different tin of biscuits.


Yeah I do enjoy that side to working in the theatre except im normally the little monkey who makes the coffee and also spot ops because they dont allow me to use anything over 6 channels in there. Makes you would think I havent engineered a 75 + bands in the past 6 months.
Eating is essential , I always try to carry at least something to nibble on

dumbass
December 3rd, 2006, 06:12 PM
One thing that hasn't been mentioned...

If you don't know frequencies... don't try to sound all teckie and shit by spewing out frequencies...

If there's some feedback starting to creep into your monitor, tell the monitor guy that you don't know what frequency it is, but you can sing/play it, or an octave of it.

Same holds true for just too much or too little of a tone.

Oh, and try to be accurate in your descriptions... PLEASE?!? What you may call "sounds a little thin", might be someone else's "where's the ass end in this thing?"

And when you give the monitor guy your example tone... just don't play or sing it one time... give it to him until you BOTH know it's taken care of.

One other thing... If you can't get a CD to the FOH guy before hand, it's OK to send someone out to FOH who knows the music to help INFORM the FOH engineer... But this is best accomplished by someone who knows tact... and sober!

Don't send some pissed up dumbass out there to bug the shit outta' my ass while I'm trying to work. A dude who knows the show that can give me a quick headsup about things is really appreciated... If you happen to be that dude... talk to me AHEAD of time! Give me some warning about special shit before they take the stage. I want your band to smoke ass!

We all want it to sound good... help the crew accomplish that, and there's not much they won't do to make that happen.

FredSanford
January 12th, 2007, 01:24 PM
Being a performing musician for many years, I have found it to be true that it is usually the soundguys that make our relationship an often troubled one. Of course this is from my biased position. I don't enjoy walking into a situation where I am being treated as if I am deaf and know little or nothing about sound. The fact is musicians spend a great deal of time listening and are often very aware of their sound, but most don't know how to convey this in technical terms to an audio engineer who has a completely different set of terminology. I have met very few engineers who know what an G7 flat 9, flat 13 chord is, but I would never fault one for not knowing this because it is not his job to know it.

The fact is without the artist getting the booking in the first place there would be no need for soundguys. Without music you could sit there and turn knobs but it won't sell any tickets. I am not trying to pick a fight here, I am just trying to point out that many engineers aren't exactly the friendliest people all the time.

I was doing a gig with Savion Glover over the summer and I learned a great "trick" observing him. Don't just introduce yourself to the engineer when you show up to the gig....ask for the soundguy's business card. We all have to work for a living.

:grin:

pounce
January 12th, 2007, 04:09 PM
Being a performing musician for many years, I have found it to be true that it is usually the soundguys that make our relationship an often troubled one. Of course this is from my biased position. I don't enjoy walking into a situation where I am being treated as if I am deaf and know little or nothing about sound. The fact is musicians spend a great deal of time listening and are often very aware of their sound, but most don't know how to convey this in technical terms to an audio engineer who has a completely different set of terminology. I have met very few engineers who know what an G7 flat 9, flat 13 chord is, but I would never fault one for not knowing this because it is not his job to know it.

The fact is without the artist getting the booking in the first place there would be no need for soundguys. Without music you could sit there and turn knobs but it won't sell any tickets. I am not trying to pick a fight here, I am just trying to point out that many engineers aren't exactly the friendliest people all the time.

I was doing a gig with Savion Glover over the summer and I learned a great "trick" observing him. Don't just introduce yourself to the engineer when you show up to the gig....ask for the soundguy's business card. We all have to work for a living.

:grin:

given your above attitude and decision that the musician/soundguy relationship is adversarial i have no doubt that you might have problems with your interactions with soundguys. i'd suggest that you stick around and perhaps you'll create a strategy that provides a better interaction with soundengineers and perhaps builds a better and deserved respect for their craft, which you don't seem to have. musicians don't need to know anything technical about sound per se, they just need to do thier part right. i would suggest them knowing something about the sound reinforcement gear is to their advantage, but yes, most do not truly know much about that. guess what, there is no "trick" to dealing with sound guys. introducing yourself, being cool, and communicating well will do just fine. i would give you my business card by the end of the gig if i wanted to work with you again anyway.

pounce
January 12th, 2007, 07:34 PM
in order to assure that my last post doesn't come off -too- strongly, i'll just amend it by saying that if you come in to a venue expecting the worst you just might get the worst.

and i'll also obviously concede that not all sound guys are good by any measure, from technically to personality. since i work in a larger venue and deal with touring shows, i see techs that are typically good. my experience in clubs, however, is spotty. some guys are good and others are not. and the bad ones have less experience with bigger shows, bigger gear, etc. and their lack of experience and perspective shows. (obviously there are very good club guys working their asses off too, just to be clear).

i'm going to start a thread that does address what do techs and venues do that is bad for the bands coming in so that it is seperate from this thread which is to focues bands on how to better get connected with the venue, gear, and staff to help make a better show happen. and in re-reading the post that got me started on this train of thought, i still think that the expectation that the soundguy will be the problem is the biggest problem you have, and that belief is going to diminish your ability to establish a productive relationship with the sound guys who are working hard to help you succeed. it's less about the techs having to kiss someones ass that we have a gig and more about adopting the attitude that we are all working on the same team to have a good sounding show. when bands think of me as an additional member, and percieve us as a team dedicated to them having a good show and sound, we achieve it together every time. and when a band in so many ways takes a more adversarial approach with me i am certainly disinclined to go the extra mile for them. treat me like the "problem" and you are not going to be getting my best work.

FredSanford
January 12th, 2007, 08:18 PM
Hey Pounce dig this.....My "attitude" as you put it developed over years of repeated interactions with extremely negative people in the audio engineer business. I startet out as a young musician trying to find his way. I was always respectful and friendly. My Momma taught me that. That didn't seem to make any difference. In fact it made it worse. You are proving my point. How many posts here complaining about musicians? I post one from the opposite perspective. I would say that maybe in you years of experience you might do well to think about things differently. Believe me I wrote what I wrote to simply point out that there is always 2 sides of a story in situations like this. As far as your accusation that I haven't any respect for the craft, I say you are wrong. I have been practicing and learning it slowly over the past 10 years. If you can't beat em.....Why do you think I am here? :)

pounce
January 12th, 2007, 08:44 PM
well, i have started a thread where your topic can be better addressed. this thread is meant to be a primer for bands to learn what things they can do to better their chances of having a good show. no need to be defensive that it's all from that perspective, it's from one perspective by design so as to stay on topic. so it's not at all a matter of two sides to the story, it's a matter of addressing a singular topic effectively and without it being a matter of fixing blame.

anyhow, you are not only very welcome here, but i specifically would like you to expand a bit on what you think creates problems for you from the band perspective in that thread to assure this topic is addressed. i want to hear more band input in general, but this thread right here isn't that place for it to happen. i'm quite certain that the constructive comments in this thread can help any band willing to digest the info. i certainly hope every musician does. that said, people on the other side of the mixer are not beyond constructive criticism, and putting well thought out and helpful comments into that other thread might prove to be a useful and informative thing for the sound guys in the forum.

ggunn
January 12th, 2007, 08:49 PM
Well, having played both sides of that street, I can say that there is ample blame for the occasional adversarial musican-sound guy relationship on both sides. As a musician, I have known curmudgeonly sound guys who are brusque and condescending to the musicians in their charge right from the start, without any provocation. OTOH, as a sound guy, I have had to deal with snotty, arrogant musicians who are only concerned with getting their own rocks off, and who treat the sound guy like a subhuman.

So, when one or the other happens, I guess it's not surprising that some residual animosity sometimes carries over to the next experience. It's incumbent on all of us, musicians and sound folks alike, to do our damndest not to bring this kind of baggage forward and to strive to build a symbiotic relationship from square one.

Kumbaya, dammit!! ;^)

bunnerabb
January 12th, 2007, 09:04 PM
I've been on both ends of the audio chain for a lot of years. I've fronted a lot of bands and mixed hundreds more, and.. I can sort of dig what he's saying.

I've walked into gigs where I knew this guy had barely a clue and a bug up his ass the size of Utah, and that is not the norm, but it happens.

I'll go out into the crowd as far as possible and give a listen when I can and try and see what's going on and if there's any glaring flaws

If there's something that needs addressed, I'll say "you know.. I know you know your room and your gig, but I was wondering if maybe you couldn't just give me ( a bit more vocal, a little less heat on the vocals, a bit more level on the guitars, put the keys into the mix, etc..) just to try it and see if you think it works for us as well as we do."

Sometimes it works, sometimes it don't, but for the most part, I've run into techs who set up the rig, give you a solid sound check if you don't stand around with your thumb up your fanny noodling and jamming while he's trying to check the drums or the vocals, want at least one song where a lot of the band sings harmonies, gets a good balance etc.

When they start saying stuff like "could you warm up your guitar tone a little" or tweak mic placements after sound check and ask the drummer to tweeze out a tom or two,.. then I know they know what the fuck they want out of the room which tells me that we'll probably work fine.

ggunn
January 12th, 2007, 09:40 PM
I'll just add that many times, on both sides of the ball, attitude is inversely proportional to expertise.

pounce
January 12th, 2007, 09:55 PM
I'll just add that many times, on both sides of the ball, attitude is inversely proportional to expertise.

aint that the truth


yeah, it's a two way street. on the gig i'm working on today, the touring crew is super great. when it's cool folks in with you for the day things go pretty well.

ps: what does anyone think about this idea. if fred sanford has had so many problems with soundguys over the past decade of gigging, what about finding a single sound reinforcement company and or sound engineer, building that relationship, and using that person all the time? seems like a great way to eliminate what is apparently a recurring problem and establish a relationship that makes things go easier.

besides, if the house staff is cranky somebody else has to deal with them (your sound guy). seems like a good solution, especially since you seem to have worse than usual luck with finding sound guys. i did have to at least -wonder- if you have more than the usual amount of trouble with soundpeople, is it them or something about your approach with them that is creating extra tension? i don't know anyone in this thread personally, so i have no idea how it is at the gigs. i've seen some pretty uncool soundguys over the years. but the question needs to be asked what can everyone do to find a better way to get everyone motivated to do their best at the gig.

pps: with respect to the original posts in this thread, the thoughts about sound check etiquette, are there any comments that anyone disagrees with? my experience has bore out these things to be a typical representation of things that regularly happen. so i think it's fair. it is just from the sound guy perspective, but it isn't factually unfounded.

Goes211
January 12th, 2007, 10:11 PM
Fred,
Pounce is the sound man you'd want to have. Because he's smart.
See, it's not 'us vs them'.
As hippy as it may seem, it's 'together we are one'.
What you are describing is a language problem.
It goes both ways. There are idiots in all camps. :D
I used to be a touring musician, and now I am a studio musician/AE, so I get to see both sides.
Musos can be real twits for the sound man. Not just because of an attitude problem, but simply by having no clue as to how things work. Sound people can be obnoxious by refusing to explain in clear terms what their problem is.
Talk. Explain. Discuss.
That's the only way.

BTW, you're very welcome here !

FredSanford
January 13th, 2007, 02:07 AM
I do indeed feel welcome here. I am thankful for that. I just was getting a sense last night that the post was taking on an "it's the dumbass musicians fault" tone. I am fully aware of the potential of musicians to be assholes. I have had my days like the worst of them. I agree completely that is better in the end to understand one other's point of view and strive to work together toward a common goal. Making the best music we can, even if we wake up on the wrong side of the bed sometimes. :Yawn:

FredSanford
January 13th, 2007, 02:25 AM
Fred,
Musos can be real twits for the sound man. Not just because of an attitude problem, but simply by having no clue as to how things work.

I have come across plenty of live sound engineers who don't have a clue about music or engineering. You guys know that is a reality. I also realize that none of the professionals here fall into that category or else I wouldn't be here seeking wisdom.

Let me end by offering my sincere gratitude for this great place and all of you who take the time to share your talent.

Peace:)

studjo
January 13th, 2007, 02:06 PM
Talent - where????

where do I have to sign up for talent????

may I have a sticker up there for talent sign up

Evil! :lol: Evil!

Jo